Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Journal 2- Part 2 Study Guide Question


1) What was the significance of the development of agriculture?
Domestication – the taming and changing, of nature for the benefit of mankind.
The end of the last Ice Age allowed warmer, wetter and more stable conditions allowing the flourishing of wild plants, especially cereal grasses
Starts storing food and creating permanent villages, now required to support whole populations, the disappearance of large mammals may have forced agriculture.
Some believe that increase in humans lead to a need to find alternative food source i.e. agriculture.
Tools were developed, digging stick and hoe
It is believed that the transision between nomadic and agricultural society only took 500 years to transition into a ag way of life.
Lead to the development of more tools, shrines, development of villages
Humans had more time to focus on developing new technologies
Lead to access of food and grains and lead to trade
Domestication of animals used for tools and food
2) Discuss the evidence that Paleolithic societies were more egalitarian than later societies. Is this evidence convincing? Why or why not?
Yes, we see evidence in with the Sans people, but cannot confirm that the Paleolithic people behaved the same way. We see examples of this through the sexual freedom of gender within the sans people, insulting the meat – social equality, few possessions material equality, images show women being revered, but we cannot confirm our ideas are what the images actually meant.
3) What did it mean to be civilized to the Mesopotamians who created the Gilgamesh story?
Enkindu
(Beast) strength of the gods, not settled, living in silence, shaggy, hangs with animals, drinks mere water, and is the protector of the animals
(Human) seeks a friend, eats bread (processed grass), drinks beer, lost connection to wildlife, gains understanding, awareness of self, clothed
4) How is an empire different from other forms of political organization? Give examples.
States, political systems that exercise coercive power
Term usually refers to larger more aggressive states, those that conquer and rule, and extract resources from other states and people.
Usually made of a variety of people and cultures under one political system
They were usually very large, creating a presence that made it hard to avoid tax collectors and armies
Despite the violence – they also fostered periods of peace, security, economic and artistic development, commercial exchange, and cultural mixing.
5) Please list the four eras we have discussed so far, along with their date ranges. How much can you recall of the four comparative bullet points that go with each era?
Paleolithic – 250,000 YA
We evolved as homo sapiens
We used basic stone tools
Socially, we formed ourselves into moving band of gather hunters
We migrated out of Africa to different contents
95% of our species time was this era
Neolithic – 17,000 YA
We out completed all other species of the genus homo
We used advanced stone tools for more complex purpose
We farmed ourselves into small settled agriculture communities
All continents except Antarctica populated by human  
Ancient Era – 3,500 BC
H.S competed with one and another for wealth and status of power
Wedeveloped a more sophisticated tech, including writing
Agricultural surpluses => specialist => Civilization + city and state
Interatios of human from different areas, leads to trade
Classical – 500 BC
Modern – 1348 AD

6) Who were the Big 5 seminal thinkers (+1) of the Classical era? What can you say about them in five minutes?

7) Is it possible to have a human society that is orderly but not oppressive? Cite examples that might make you more confident in your answer.

8) Why does Strayer change the term “hunter-gatherer” to the term “gatherer-hunter”? Is this change consistent or inconsistent with the values of the Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur as outlined in the Hallmarks? Should other scholars who write textbooks on World History adopt this change?


9) Please discuss the accomplishments of the Ancient peoples of the Indus Valley. Why don’t scholars know more about them?


No comments:

Post a Comment